The charges had been paid by “Bulgarian firms”, working as fronts for OneCoin.
The implication being that Di Donna was laundering cash for the $4.6 billion Ponzi scheme.
The Monetary Intelligence Unit’s anti-money laundering division launched an investigation.
They discovered “tons of of 1000’s of euros” had handed via financial institution accounts tied to Di Donna. The funds had arrived from overseas, via real-estate firms in Eire.
In November 2019 Konstantin Ignatov, former OneCoin CEO and brother of founder Ruja Ignatova, testified that a part of OneCoin’s cash laundering operations was performed via the Financial institution of Eire.
Italian investigators allege in July 2018, Di Donna
benefited from a financial institution switch from Sofia: € 321,000 paid by B&N Seek the advice of Eood.
It was not the one fee: 4 months later, on the finish of November, a brand new donation of virtually 365 thousand euros arrived on the account of the lawyer.
Cause for “closing fee on success price ”, reads the report. Translated: “Remaining fee for objective achieved”.
What goal it’s will not be specified.
The US DOJ has recognized B&N Seek the advice of Eood as a social gathering of curiosity in prison proceedings towards Ruja Ignatova.
B&N Seek the advice of Ltd., presumably a associated entity, was additionally cited in Mark Scott’s $400 million OneCoin cash laundering case.
In apply, inside 100 days, the buddy of the prime minister “subsequently acquired a complete of € 685,786 from B&N Seek the advice of, presumably by the use of fee for companies,” the monetary investigators write.
The B&N Firms had been arrange and owned by OneCoin insider Irina Dilkinska. After OneCoin collapsed in early 2017, management was transferred to Aleksandar Boychev Stavrev, an affiliate with ties to Ruja’s husband.
The revelations by investigators type a part of a wider investigation into Di Donna, who’s accused of masks grifting throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.
Di Donna is alleged to have leaned on his connection to Prime Minister Conte to generate curiosity in his enterprise enterprise.
As I perceive it, Di Donna’s enterprise companions initiated the investigation by submitting a criticism.
Di Donna claims his
accusers have invented false circumstances and lies “which can quickly be demonstrated in entrance of the investigators”.
When questioned on the matter, Prime Minister Conte said Di Donna was “now not an affiliate”.
